14 Jul 2020
香港特別行政區 訴 劉偉德
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 1353
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA364/2019
The appellant's emailed replies and electronic signature did not comply with the RTO s63(4) requirement for a written statement in the specified form and signed original; the Electronic Transactions Ordinance does not override or apply to this statutory requirement in the circumstances because its relevant provisions are inapplicable to such legal process and its application would conflict with the RTO and established practice; accordingly the trial judge correctly convicted and sentenced the appellant.