27 Jul 2022
徐學仲及另一人 對 文耀樓業主立案法團
- Citation
- [2022] HKDC 795
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ1196/2019
The summons to add paragraph 14 was dismissed because the applicants sought a substantive remedy after prolonged delay (more than three years since transfer and after a trial date was set), had not previously pleaded or sought the relief, and the proposed dispute over construction method was unsuitable for late amendment given lack of pleaded issues and absence of necessary evidence (including expert evidence). The respondent's pleaded explanation that non-cooperation between owners prevented works undermined the applicants' claim that the corporation had refused to implement the resolution.…