10 May 2021
鄧琳 對 天薈僱傭有限公司
- Citation
- [2021] HKLdT 33
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDPE1479/2020
Respondent had notice of the hearing and could have appointed a representative; medical notes were insufficient and respondent delayed producing evidence; respondent's factual case (claims of overpayment) was inconsistent and the respondent was an unreliable witness with no real prospect of success; setting aside the order would cause uncompensable prejudice to the applicant, therefore the non‑substantive applications to suspend/set aside the Tribunal's order were dismissed and the 22 January 2021 order upheld.