19 Apr 2006
UNITED NON-FERROUS TRADING LTD v. NEO CHINA LTD
- Citation
- UNITED NON-FERROUS TRADING LTD v. NEO CHINA LTD
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ3322/2003
On the balance of probabilities the Court found that Neo Qingyuan (WF/NQ) was the true contracting buyer, that the Defendant acted as intermediary/collecting agent and not as principal buyer, that the Scrap was delivered to NQ, and that the Plaintiff failed to prove Defendant liable for the claimed Balance Price; the Plaintiff's claim was dismissed and costs awarded to the Defendant.