18 May 2026
The applicant's grounds were general and lacking particulars; he failed to identify any legal or procedural error in the judge's refusal to grant leave to apply for judicial review, therefore the appeal must be dismissed.
15 May 2026
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to advance any viable, specific grounds demonstrating error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision or in the Deputy Judge's refusal of leave; the Court of Appeal will not interfere absent such grounds and will not rehear the Board's factual assessments.
15 May 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to advance any viable ground showing that the judge erred; no error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality was shown in the Board's decision and there is no basis to interfere with the judge's refusal of leave.
13 May 2026
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the applicant failed to identify any arguable ground, the Board's findings on credibility, country information, availability of state protection and internal relocation were supported by evidence and lawful reasoning, and no legal error, procedural unfairness or irrationality was shown in the Board's decision.
11 May 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any viable ground to reverse the Deputy High Court Judge's refusal of leave; the submissions were general allegations without particulars and did not demonstrate error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Judge's decision.
11 May 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any error in the judge's refusal to grant leave, offered only general allegations without particulars and therefore put forward no viable ground to reverse the judge; absent error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality the Court will not intervene.
7 May 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify or substantiate any error in the judge's refusal of leave, advanced only bare allegations without particulars, and waived an oral hearing by not filing required written submissions; no viable ground existed to overturn the order refusing leave.
7 May 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any viable grounds of error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision; bare, unsubstantiated assertions do not suffice to overturn the judge's refusal of leave to apply for judicial review.
6 May 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to advance any viable grounds demonstrating that the Judge erred in refusing leave; there was no identified error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision and the Court of Appeal will not reassess the Board's factual determinations.
6 May 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant advanced only general, unparticularised allegations and failed to demonstrate any viable ground to reverse the Judge's refusal of leave; no error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality was shown.