12 Nov 2020
BT and CBY (formerly known as YHK and also known as YCB)
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFA 35
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FAMV121/2020
Leave to appeal was refused because none of the proffered questions raised issues of sufficient general or public importance, many questions were unarguable or were not raised below or were factual, and the Court of Appeal correctly applied YBL v LWC by assessing the husband's means during the compliance period and properly concluded contempt and justified committal.