17 Feb 2017
陸浩光 v. 海天企業（國際）有限公司
- Citation
- 陸浩光 v. 海天企業（國際）有限公司
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCEC278/2014
The 1st Applicant was not an employee of the Respondent but a building sub-contractor; his account of the alleged 22 May 2012 accident was inherently incredible and contradicted by contemporaneous statements, so no compensable work accident was found for him; although the 2nd Applicant was found to have been injured on 24 February 2012, the parties had agreed that the 2nd Applicant's employment status followed the court's ruling on the 1st Applicant, so both applications were dismissed. The employment relationship was determined by applying the multi-factorial Poon test and assessing credibil…