7 May 2021
唐仁義 對 泰穗貿易有限公司
- Citation
- [2021] HKCA 628
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CAMP242/2020
Leave to appeal was refused because (a) the leave application was timely once the legal aid suspension was excluded from the time limit, and (b) there was no arguable appeal with a real prospect of success: the trial judge's factual findings that the 2013 deposit had been effectively transferred and that the parties acted consistently with that transfer were not shown to be wrong, the applicant's new assertions were not raised at trial and conflicted with objective conduct, and the alleged forgery was irrelevant to the outcome.