19 Aug 2010
DEIULEMAR SHIPPING SPA AND OTHERS v. TRANSFIELD ER FUTURES LTD
- Citation
- DEIULEMAR SHIPPING SPA AND OTHERS v. TRANSFIELD ER FUTURES LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1490/2010
Leave to appeal is refused because the judge correctly exercised discretion in refusing the Mareva injunction: plaintiffs had an arguable case but the balance of prejudice, real risk of severe and possibly terminal harm to the defendant's business, and the principles of open justice and prompt disclosure justified refusing the interlocutory relief and ordering disclosure; no error of law or principle was shown.