29 Jan 2002
HKSAR v. CHANG KIN MAN IVAN
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHANG KIN MAN IVAN
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC74/2001
Although the judge erred in her handling and weighting of Mr Chang's inconsistent evidence and trial counsel failed to put the applicant's good character, the totality of cogent evidence (bookkeeper's evidence, indistinguishable company goods on no-prefix memos, joint account payments to applicant) made the convictions safe; accordingly the Court applied the proviso in section 83 Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Cap.221) and dismissed the appeal, upholding the convictions.