3 Oct 2017
COMPETITION COMMISSION v. NUTANIX HONG KONG LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- COMPETITION COMMISSION v. NUTANIX HONG KONG LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Case number
- CTEA1/2017
s45(2) protects only the person who was required by a s42 notice to attend and answer questions (the individual interviewee); it does not render statements inadmissible against the employer undertaking. The respondents' constructions and any read‑in remedy were rejected; therefore the strike out/debarment applications fail.