13 Dec 1991
EXTRAMONEY LTD AND ANOTHER v. CHAN, LAI, PANG & CO. (a firm)
- Citation
- EXTRAMONEY LTD AND ANOTHER v. CHAN, LAI, PANG & CO. (a firm)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV67/1991
The court held that ordering particulars requiring the plaintiffs to state what they would have done if the accounts had been qualified was inappropriate because the question is hypothetical and speculative; causation and the specific evidence of loss are matters for trial evidence rather than particulars, so the master’s order requiring those particulars was wrongly made and should be set aside.