12 Jan 2015
EDS WELLNESS HOLDINGS LTD v. SHUM YEUNG
- Citation
- EDS WELLNESS HOLDINGS LTD v. SHUM YEUNG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1775/2012
EDS's application to file the 9th affirmation was allowed. Shum's summons to set aside the sealed summary judgment was dismissed for procedural defect because the court was functus officio; the sealed judgment could only be impugned by appeal or fresh action. Costs awarded to EDS, to be taxed if not agreed, with certificate for two counsel.