9 Sept 1999
NG YAT CHI v. MAX SHARE LTD. AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- NG YAT CHI v. MAX SHARE LTD. AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCW321/1996
The application was dismissed because it was made too late, the Respondents gave no adequate explanation for the delay in delivering particulars, ordering further security at that stage would be unfair to the Petitioner and would disrupt the hearing; the Court therefore refused to order additional security and proceeded with the petition.