20 Apr 2018
GOLDCREST MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS LTD v. GREAT WISH CORPORATION LTD
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 416
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCDT307/2018
The claimant failed to prove ownership and did not justify an adjournment because the evidence was inadequate, suggested deliberate withholding, and the documents sought (bank records/cheque images) would not bridge the gap between proof of payment and proof of ownership; further delay would prejudice the landlord by permitting continued use of distrained goods and defeating the distraint remedy; claim dismissed and costs awarded to the plaintiff.