19 Jul 2011
CHRISTIAN EMIL TOGGENBURGER AND OTHERS v. LUU, HUNG VIET DERRICK AND OTHERS
- Citation
- CHRISTIAN EMIL TOGGENBURGER AND OTHERS v. LUU, HUNG VIET DERRICK AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA815/2009
The Court held that plaintiffs had established relevance, existence and sufficient indicia of possession for most requested document classes and that defendants' confidentiality objections could be addressed by redaction; the duty to disclose is independent and continuing so discovery was ordered for specified classes; in-camera HCMA proceedings were not shown to be related and therefore not discoverable; voluntary particulars were refused because they attempted to introduce new causes of action and should have been pursued by formal amendment rather than by voluntary particulars.