3 Jul 2002
CHU PING TAK TIM v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
- Citation
- CHU PING TAK TIM v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL3672/2001
Regulation 3(2)(m) may be made out without separate proof of impaired efficiency; on the facts the Applicant's repeated lending to finance high‑risk margin speculation while heavily indebted was sufficiently imprudent to justify a finding of conduct likely to bring the Force into disrepute; the dismissal sentence was not so disproportionate as to be perverse; however the failure to disclose material memoranda to the Deputy Commissioner breached the duty of fairness and produced prejudice sufficient to quash the Deputy Commissioners dismissal of the appeal and the Commissioners consequent or…