11 Jul 2014
KOMAL PATEL AND OTHERS v. CHRIS AU AND OTHERS
- Citation
- KOMAL PATEL AND OTHERS v. CHRIS AU AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA183/2014
The court found material non‑disclosure in the ex parte freezing application (misreading/overstatement of unpaid dividends and failure to draw attention to evidential material supporting Au's claim to a 35.5% interest) but concluded the non‑disclosure was not deliberate nor so significant as to preclude re‑granting protective relief. Weighing the parties' competing risks, the judge re‑crafted and re‑granted a limited freezing injunction confined to Retribution's property (shares in Kudeta BVI and bank funds), continued the 26 March 2014 interlocutory injunction, and refused the plaintiffs' su…