20 Mar 1984
MAILEX LIMITED v. GREFO LIMITED
- Citation
- MAILEX LIMITED v. GREFO LIMITED
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV153/1983
The court refused the applications for extension of time and leave to appeal because the delay in applying was not satisfactorily explained and because the order refusing leave to amend was interlocutory (not a final order for an appeal as of right) and, in any event, the proposed appeal would fail on the merits as the issue was already decided and binding between the parties.