31 Jan 2013
LILAS AROMAS LTD v. CHAN KA YAN AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- LILAS AROMAS LTD v. CHAN KA YAN AND ANOTHER
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ3868/2012
The plaintiff's application was dismissed because the non-competition clause was wider than reasonably necessary and vague in its geographic scope (cannot be blue‑penciled without rewriting clause 3.1), the plaintiff failed to show that customer names and mobile numbers were confidential or misused, and the balance of convenience favored maintaining the status quo given delay and the short remaining duration of proposed injunctions, so the plaintiff lacked a good prospect of success.