14 Jul 2015
張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份及另一人 v. 張才奎及另一人
- Citation
- 張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份及另一人 v. 張才奎及另一人
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA623/2015
Direction 1 was dismissed because paragraph 18 of the prior 3rd decision already prevents the receivers from altering board composition without seeking court directions; the receivers are independent, the issue was premature as the receivers had not yet decided and may need to investigate and seek directions themselves, and D1's proactive summons was an improper interference that wasted receivers' time and court resources. Costs were ordered against D1 accordingly.