22 Jul 2014
SINODENTAL INVESTMENTS LTD AND OTHERS v. SIN CHUNG YIN RONALD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- SINODENTAL INVESTMENTS LTD AND OTHERS v. SIN CHUNG YIN RONALD AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2176/2012
The court dismissed the strike‑out application and allowed the amendment because on the pleaded facts the plaintiffs' case was not plainly unsustainable: circumstantial allegations could support inferences of participation and conspiracy and proposed amendments cured inconsistencies; therefore it would be inappropriate at interlocutory stage to strike out those paragraphs rather than leave matters for trial.