30 Sept 2016
HKSAR v. YU LIK WAI WILLIAM AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. YU LIK WAI WILLIAM AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC237/2015
Leave to appeal was refused because none of the grounds raised a reasonably arguable case: the trial judge permissibly admitted covert recordings and did not unfairly exercise discretion; he reasonably found both applicants lacked honest belief or lawful authority such that any error on how s24 burden was characterized was harmless; section 61 ICSO and the statutory disclosure/ex parte procedure supplied adequate safeguards so non-disclosure of redacted surveillance authorizations was justified and no inspection was warranted where relevance was speculative.