11 May 2004
GOLDEN TECH (ASIA) LTD v. PO YUEN (TO\'S) MACHINE FACTORY LTD
- Citation
- GOLDEN TECH (ASIA) LTD v. PO YUEN (TO\'S) MACHINE FACTORY LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA4517/2001
The judge held that Practice Direction 5.4's skeleton-argument requirement did not apply to a hearing listed for two hours; the adjournment was caused by the plaintiff's late filing of the 2nd affirmation without leave and therefore Master Levy was correct to order costs against the plaintiff; the appeal was dismissed with costs to the defendant.