12 Feb 2015
香港特別行政區 訴 陳志翔及另三人
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 陳志翔及另三人
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA680/2013
Convictions were unsafe because credible evidence showed a realistic possibility that the appellants were effectively employed and controlled by Ha's outsourced team (not solely by 首華), creating reasonable doubt as to whether payments were advantages in relation to 首華's affairs; having adduced sufficient evidence under s24 to raise reasonable doubt, prosecution failed to prove the elements of s9 beyond reasonable doubt, so convictions must be quashed.