10 Mar 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 鄭志恩
- Citation
- [2022] HKCA 417
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC240/2021
The appeal was refused because the sentencing judge properly applied sentencing principles: the burglary involved an organised and premeditated operation targeting a dwelling with significant loss, justifying a 4‑year starting point reduced by one‑third for plea to 32 months; misuse of another's ID justified a 12‑month sentence after discount; limited concurrency (3 months) was appropriate given separate dates and locations; the aggregate 41‑month term was not manifestly excessive and no arguable ground for leave existed.