5 Oct 1981
DR HENRIETTA MAN HING IP v. CROCUS PROPERTY INC
- Citation
- DR HENRIETTA MAN HING IP v. CROCUS PROPERTY INC
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA4910/1980
Although the parties intended the document to be binding, the contract was unenforceable because essential terms were left unresolved: the parties contemplated but did not agree the terms of a Sub-Deed of Mutual Covenant essential to define rights between co-owners, and the method for calculating gross area (and thus price) was insufficiently defined; accordingly specific performance was refused and registration vacated.