Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Hong Kong Case Law

Case stated amendment
  • 26 Aug 2011

    TUNGTEX TRADING CO LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE

    Citation
    TUNGTEX TRADING CO LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
    Court
    Court of First Instance
    Case number
    HCIA7/2009

    Application dismissed: proposed additional factual findings and amended questions were not material to any tenable argument given the Board's findings that the JV was the separate manufacturer and that the taxpayer's profit producing transactions (purchase and resale) were in Hong Kong; binding authorities (Datatronic, CG Lighting) establish such antecedent/ancillary activities do not change source; DIPN 21 does not confer legal entitlement to apportionment. The Court will not direct the Board to make the taxpayer's proposed findings or to restate questions accordingly.