22 Dec 2016
HKSAR v. FAN MING-KEI, ANTHONY AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. FAN MING-KEI, ANTHONY AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC319/2015
The Court upheld both convictions: the 1st appellant's omission/implicit representation that Convoy would act induced the policyholders thereby causing prejudice and resulting in benefit; the 2nd appellant's video interview and notebook entries were admissible as voluntary; although the trial judge erred in finding the 2nd appellant personally benefited, that error did not undermine proof of prejudice to Zurich under s16A(1) so convictions stand; sentencing was appropriate for the 1st appellant but the 2nd appellant's sentence was reduced on appeal to reflect absence of proven personal financ…