26 Jul 1996
R. v. CHAN PANG CHING
- Citation
- R. v. CHAN PANG CHING
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC783/1995
The conviction was unsafe because the trial judge improperly relied on the post-record cautioned statement without reconciling it with inconsistent oral evidence and failed to consider the second limb of the statutory defence in s.37D(2); accordingly the appeal was allowed and the conviction quashed.