28 Nov 1995
R. v. CHEUNG CHI-LUN
- Citation
- R. v. CHEUNG CHI-LUN
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC428/1995
The trial judge lawfully resolved conflicts in timing and credibility, properly admitted the cautioned statements as voluntary, and could rely on corroborative forensic and fingerprint evidence; absent a clear legal or factual error the appellate court will not disturb the conviction, therefore leave to appeal is refused.