9 Aug 2005
SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHUNG WAI SING AND OTHERS
- Citation
- SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHUNG WAI SING AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA225/2004
The magistrate erred in importing into Rule III obligations that do not exist; the printed caution administered at charging and contemporaneous conduct did not render the written replies involuntary as a matter of law; showing parts of the surveillance videotape during investigatory cautioned interviews did not breach Rule VI because the interviews occurred at investigatory stage governed by Rule I; absent specific evidence of oppression and where voluntariness was not challenged at trial for particular interviews, the exclusion of the interviews and charge-sheet replies was unsupportable and…