12 Mar 2019
黃桂生 對 鄭禮春及另一人
- Citation
- [2019] HKDC 226
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ738/2018
Leave to appeal refused because each proposed ground lacked a reasonable prospect of success: no evidence of actual or apparent judicial bias; no demonstrated legal error on the court's analysis of lease certainty; contractual licence was not pleaded and could not sustain the claim in any event because a licence is revocable absent contractual protection and the pleadings did not allege any such protection.