1 Aug 2018
黃桂生 對 鄭禮春及另一人
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 888
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ738/2018
The alleged oral tenancy was legally invalid because its term ('until the claimant's appeal/review process is completed') is uncertain; therefore the statement of claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action and must be struck out; consequently no interim injunction for possession is granted and possession is awarded to the registered owner under case management powers.