15 Nov 2012
鄭 對 黃
- Citation
- 鄭 對 黃
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1677/2012
The application for leave to appeal was refused because the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable prospect of success or any other sufficient interest of justice; the trial judge's factual findings and discretionary decision to reserve part of the sale proceeds for children's maintenance were supported by the evidence and consistent with LKW v DD, and there was no demonstrable legal error warranting appellate intervention.