12 Mar 2019
莊裕安 對 關淑馨及另二人
- Citation
- [2019] HKDC 330
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCEO13/2018
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's grounds lacked a reasonable prospect of success and there were no other interests of justice warranting a hearing: the facts and law were clear, the claim was plainly inconsistent with Basic Law Article 85, there was no arguable basis to join the Judiciary or to appoint an amicus, and the trial judge's case management decisions were proper, so permission to appeal was denied and no order as to costs was made.