2 Mar 2021
黃德忠及另一人 對 黃炳城
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 501
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP2188/2017
The court refused all three summons applications: the costs order dated 11 Aug 2020 is valid and plaintiffs may proceed with costs assessment under O.62 r.21; non-sale of the land within the six-month period does not deprive plaintiffs of the right to enforce the costs order and parties should apply if they seek extension or variation; the defendant cannot use these summons to collaterally attack or overturn earlier orders or obtain declaratory relief regarding title; the public notice was lawful; defendant must pay plaintiffs' costs of the summons to be taxed unless agreed.