8 Jan 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 范敏怡
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 94
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA89/2023
The High Court held the magistrate acted within jurisdiction under s101A, properly inquired into the appellant's means and reasonably rejected an impractical prolonged payment plan; the substitute custodial sentences of 21 days per fine concurrent fell within the statutory limits and were not manifestly excessive, so the appeal against the committal/detention orders was dismissed.