27 Aug 2025
LCH v. WPSN
- Citation
- [2025] HKCA 783
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV327/2024
Leave to appeal refused because the proposed questions were not reasonably arguable: direct committal under Order 52 r 2 is available and not precluded by YBL or PD SL10.2; lack of funds is not a generally arguable defence outside the specific factual context; the penal notice point failed because no objection was taken below, the Flywin principle applies, and the order in question was endorsed with and served with a penal notice. Costs awarded and no stay granted.