21 Oct 2004
嘉居樂物業管理有限公司 v. 家安花園業主立案法團
- Citation
- 嘉居樂物業管理有限公司 v. 家安花園業主立案法團
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDBM188/2004
The tribunal held that paragraph 7(5A) allows owners liable to pay to vote even if in arrears, but the proxy instrument for Billion China did not bear an embossment of the common seal and so was invalid under paragraph 4(2) of the Third Schedule; consequently the resolution had support below the required 50% and was therefore invalid, so the Applicant's appointment was not terminated.