12 Jan 1990
LANDALE DEVELOPMENT LTD. v. ZHUM HENG DEVELOPMENT LTD.
- Citation
- LANDALE DEVELOPMENT LTD. v. ZHUM HENG DEVELOPMENT LTD.
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ12640/1989
There was a binding contract and the arbitration clause on the back was validly incorporated: clause 10 put the plaintiff on notice of additional terms, the plaintiff must have known only the front had been faxed and nevertheless signed and returned it without asking for the back, which is equivalent to signing without reading; accordingly the arbitration agreement was incorporated and a mandatory stay under s6A was required.