25 Sept 2024
莊裕安 v. 馬道立 AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 2596
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL924/2023
All six applications were dismissed because the applicant failed to identify an impugned decision and any reasonably arguable public law ground, the challenges constituted impermissible collateral attacks on concluded judgments and an abuse of process, and the High Court lacks jurisdiction to grant the relief sought against final judicial decisions or private actors not exercising public functions; the RPO previously made was necessary and appropriate and is endorsed.