31 May 2024
添盟有限公司 對 梁志文
- Citation
- [2024] HKDC 823
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ5204/2023
The judge refused the late appeal because the defendant's delay was inadequately explained and the proposed appeal had no real prospect of success: the sale order and transfer validly terminated the defendant's interest so he is a trespasser and the hearing officer correctly granted summary judgment for delivery of vacant possession and unassessed damages; the defendant's purported fresh evidence failed Ladd v Marshall first and second limbs and would not alter the outcome; costs awarded to the plaintiff but reduced by 50% because the plaintiff failed to comply with practice direction on skel…