29 Sept 2021
MAEDA KENSETSU KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA also known as MAEDA CORPORATION AND ANOTHER v. BAUER HONG KONG LTD
- Citation
- [2021] HKCA 1420
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CAMP154/2018
The Court dismissed the defendant's application for leave to appeal as procedurally pointless because the substantive appeal had already been heard and, alternatively, the judge was entitled to find the questions were of general importance and that the arbitrator's decision was open to serious doubt; no special reason existed to grant further leave, and plaintiffs were awarded indemnity costs of HK$124,100.