6 Dec 1994
CHAN WING KUEN and Another v. R.
- Citation
- CHAN WING KUEN and Another v. R.
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC231/1994
On the uncontested evidence the victim was unlawfully restrained and directed by the appellants until repayment arrangements were completed; such detention amounted to false imprisonment as defined in R. v. Rahman and required no proof of explicit threats, so the judge was entitled to reject the no‑case submission and convict.