27 Dec 2019
香港特別行政區 訴 周志忠
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 447
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA500/2019
The trial judge's acceptance of the prosecution witnesses and rejection of the appellant's inconsistent account, combined with the objective evidence of a low balance, a HK$20,000 deposit and near‑immediate withdrawal requiring a PIN only known to the appellant, supported the only rational inference that the appellant conspired to allow use of his account for proceeds of an indictable offence; the appellate court will not disturb that finding and thus the conviction is safe.