19 Jul 2007
RE NEW MAY LANDSCAPE LTD
- Citation
- RE NEW MAY LANDSCAPE LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT30/2007
The Arbitrator's constructions of the contract and factual findings were not shown to be 'seriously wrong'; the quantum meruit claim was unpleaded and lacked the required factual basis; cleaning obligations depend on schedule frequency; clause 26 did not render the wage issue immune to contractual remedies; the liquidated damages were a reasonable estimate of administrative cost and not a penalty; refusal of discovery did not amount to misconduct because the records would not have assisted the unjust enrichment claim. Therefore leave to appeal and applications to set aside fail.