28 May 2020
DAELIM CORPORATION v. BONITA CO. LTD
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 902
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT34/2019
The court continued the Hong Kong injunction because plaintiff established a good arguable case that the TSA did not settle the unpaid hire (TSA covered only prospective loss), there was sufficient urgency and legitimate reason for secrecy for an ex parte application, the alleged non-disclosures were not material to the ex parte judge's weighing exercise, and the UK arbitration was capable of producing an award enforceable in Hong Kong; accordingly the balance of justice required continuation of the injunction.