10 Feb 2026
香港特別行政區 訴 王詩雅
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 896
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA145/2024
The Regulation must be read purposively: s3(4) does not require the prosecution to prove the accused knew the caller's precise statutory title as "health officer" or "authorized person"; it is sufficient to prove the accused knew the background, purpose and that the information was being provided in response to a health‑department contact tracing/public‑health request. On the evidence (multiple calls, admissions and credible witnesses) the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant knew she was giving information in response to such a request; convictions therefore stand.