13 Nov 1984
LAM NGOK-YEUNG v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- LAM NGOK-YEUNG v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP3050/1984
The warrant and committal were quashed because the record showed the applicant had obeyed the summons and given evidence, there was no refusal to give evidence within s.36(1)(b), and the judge failed to afford the procedural protections and fair opportunity to explain or obtain representation required before summary committal; accordingly habeas corpus was granted and the warrant set aside.